http://twitter.com/#!/Steve_Jaye/status/450651452571021312
#Nancy Pelosi is gushing today over an article in the LA Times:
http://twitter.com/#!/NancyPelosi/status/450650031679606784Just last week, the Dems were rejoicing over a purported 6 million &8220;enrollees.&8221;
http://twitter.com/#!/PydePypper/status/450650783781228544That’s quite a leap.
http://twitter.com/#!/ommfgr/status/450651700794122241 http://twitter.com/#!/winojanet/status/450651354550132736Well, the Dems have made it quite clear that facts just aren&8217;t important to them. But we&8217;re open-minded. We&8217;re willing to consider where this 9.5 million comes from.
The Washington Examiner&8217;s #Byron York took a closer look:
http://twitter.com/#!/ByronYork/status/450665102145257472Read it and weep:
The Times says the numbers break down like this: 4.5 million previously uninsured people are now on Medicaid; 3 million previously uninsured young people are now covered because of a provision that allows them to stay on their parents&8217; policies until age 26; and 2 million previously uninsured have purchased coverage on the #Obamacare exchanges. In all, it is “the largest expansion in #health coverage in America in half a century,” according to the Times.
Assume all the numbers are correct, or at least close to correct. By far the largest part of Obamacare&8217;s #health coverage expansion has come from a) expanding Medicaid, and b) allowing young people to stay on their parents&8217; coverage. The part in which Democrats essentially blew up the health care markets, imposed the individual mandate, caused premiums to rise and deductibles to skyrocket? That hasn&8217;t been such a success. If the Times number are correct, all of that — placing new burdens of higher costs and narrower choices on millions of Americans, in addition to setting the stage for coming changes in employer-based coverage &8212; has resulted in two million previously uninsured gaining coverage.
http://twitter.com/#!/ByronYork/status/450665201030139904So, according to York, if we go by the LA Times&8217; breakdown, only 2 million people (21 percent) of the previously uninsured 9.5 million gained coverage through Obamacare exchanges.
http://twitter.com/#!/seanagnew/status/450669427739361280The number of people who have gotten screwed by Obamacare is much higher:
http://twitter.com/#!/cherilboyer/status/450652307542114305 http://twitter.com/#!/jblanchard8012/status/450655053167067136She&8217;s just plain misinformed. And we&8217;re paying for it.
***
Related:
Media lapdogs trumpet lousy, inaccurate Obamacare ‘enrollment’ figures
Pathetic: Jay Carney says WH still doesn’t have accurate Obamacare data, lies about enrollment goal
Shockah! HHS touts 3 million Obamacare ‘enrollments’ but doesn’t know when they happened
Obama administration’s O-care enrollment ‘good news’ demolished by reality
‘Burn’: Drudge zings Obamacare enrollment with chihuahua-riffic comparison
Ted Cruz has a simple question about Obama admin’s lack of O-care enrollment tracking
HHS touts O-care enrollment of 5 million; Incurious lapdoggies parrot number amid skepticism
‘Take my word for it’: Dems celebrate 6 million O-care enrollees; Requests for proof ignored
Ron Fournier rains ‘stubborn facts’ on 6 million Obamacare sign-ups party
Twitchy coverage of Nancy Pelosi
The post Pelosi says 9.5 million now covered thanks to O-care; Byron York has reality check Find more on: Health Tips
No comments:
Post a Comment